WORK notes 

WIKIPEDIA proposals

MainTemplate
Talk tab is not prominent and informative enough 
as it does not take into account that many pages
could have very interesting information 
and/or lively discussions behind the static/stable front.
Idaelly it would visualize the quantity/volume of activity
and entities being involved in Talk-activities.


BannerTemplate 
to be made (ideally at least 2:
#1 being more about diversity of voices and 
#2 more radical and against normativity) 
and launched with somewhat of a strategy
#a ideally via higher ranked wikimedia accounts)
#b together (?) and simultanious (?)
so it does not get deleted easily by hard-core Wikimedia Deletionists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletionism_and_inclusionism_in_Wikipedia



Examples of existing BannerTemplates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages/Cleanup#Neutrality_and_factual_accuracy
Interesting banner templates:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Criticism_section
search : insource:/=(=|= )(Criticism|Controversy)( =|=)=/

Creating a new template banner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Template_messages

Criticism or Controversy: please add more criticism or controversy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KVPA-9hofw

Templates: {{em}}

{{POV}}
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met.(February 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

2 proposals:
One fictionnal / radical:
{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#invoke:Unsubst||$N=POV |date=__DATE__ |$B=
<!--{{POV}} begin-->{{Ambox
| name  = POV
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:substcheck}}</includeonly>
| small = {{{small|}}}
| type  = content
| class = ambox-POV
| style = {{{style|}}}
| image = [[File:Unbalanced scales.svg|50x40px|link=]]
| issue = The '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]] of this {{{what|article}}} is [[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|disputed]]'''.
| talk  = {{{talk|#}}}
| fix   = Please do not remove this message until [[Template:POV#When to remove|conditions to do so are met]].
| removalnotice = yes
| date  = {{{date|}}}
| cat   = NPOV disputes
| all   = All NPOV disputes
}}<!--{{POV}} end-->
}}<noinclude>
{{Documentation}}
</noinclude>

One Practical / possibly integrate on the platform
{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#invoke:Unsubst||$N=POV |date=__DATE__ |$B=
<!--{{POV}} begin-->{{Ambox
| name  = POV
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:substcheck}}</includeonly>
| small = {{{small|}}}
| type  = content
| class = ambox-POV
| style = {{{style|}}}
| image = [[File:Unbalanced scales.svg|50x40px|link=]]
| issue = The '''[[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutrality]] of this {{{what|article}}} is [[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute|disputed]]'''.
| talk  = {{{talk|#}}}
| fix   = Please do not remove this message until [[Template:POV#When to remove|conditions to do so are met]].
| removalnotice = yes
| date  = {{{date|}}}
| cat   = NPOV disputes
| all   = All NPOV disputes
}}<!--{{POV}} end-->
}}<noinclude>
{{Documentation}}
</noinclude>



WORDING WE COULD USE:
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/incontrovertible

IMAGES WE COULD USE:
to create new icon, 
#1 feather or mobile as dynamic balancing, and 
#2 something messier about multiplicity and/or equalizing
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_%28sculpture%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_%28sculpture%29#/media/File:Calder-redmobile.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_%28sculpture%29#/media/File:Modern_mobile-art_mobiles_mobius.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equalization_(audio) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equalization_%28audio%29#/media/File:Graphic_equalizer.jpg

-------------------------

Histories of conflicts and confusions
ZELJKO BLACE

perspective on queering and the archives

cofounding member of MAMA, cultural center of Multimedia Insitute Zagreb http://mama.mi2.hr/
background: queer practise & activism, grassroot work in social spheres
critical to LGTB mainstreaming & normalisation
as curator after doing many media art exhibition, 
then started doing sport exhibition 
(recent https://archiv.ngbk.de/en/projekte/contesting-contexting-sport-2016/ )
systems that project this idea of 
neutrality, petrifies something as the norm, 
which you have to fight as a radical less than you are not. 

Started to work with Schwules Museum Berlin, gay Museum:http://www.schwulesmuseum.de/
they did 'bad' exhibition on homosexuality, very popular
queer reading of the exhibition was not successful, very little queer- & transnarratives
has 100y collection of art, mainly private collections of wealthy white gay males
missing elements were hand drawn..., 'design quick fix'
mistakes when people have good intentions
-> gay/lesbian/trans/queer sports exhibition: 1 part online, 1 part in the museum
-> collaborative: usually you choose collaborators you agree with, not people you go into conflict with

what could be a participatory systems to deal with histories that are not ?represented?? as they appear.
revision process: what is no longer called paiting
insititutions are writing the queer history now, renaming works with more politically correct names
not explicit to the public.. just fixing up names. taken fo granted in the last version..

intervention into archive into museum such as Van Abbe Museum
https://vanabbemuseum.nl/en/collection/queering/
https://www.facebook.com/events/1734621030131167/ *(Thursdays)
we'll start to deal with things proceduraly
they invite (systemically accepted) artists, not activists, which relieves them of the necessity to represent lgbt interests
appearing more progressive then they are

when Fundació Antoni Tàpies collaborates with the problematic croatian museum of contemporary art, in the 'sharing' EU-context, feminist tools & visions in the project, but the CR museum only picked up finacial stream
ay (Olympic) Games, forked into OutGames
in Balkans: conflict is a virtue, not a sin ;-)
negative feedback is essential part of production (vs US culture)

'we will not build a history, but it will be a series of statements that will collide against each other'

How to do this? Wiki? Wikipedia?
not producing single document pages, but source code, but needs output that are accessible for public
show that 'not all gays are victims & not all gays are happy'

What kinds of content can we imagine to articulate as series of conflicts? Instead of single position.
ex the breakdown of Yougoslavia in 4 concurrent versions
Have a look at this 'The Danger of a Single Story' by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9Ihs241zeg
She's a great writer, no relationships in first sentence of Wikipedia :-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimamanda_Ngozi_Adichie

Might be interested in not looking at the objects, but at the metadata: which objects were promiscuous?

Questions & comments
Dona: audience of museum is not diverse, finding new narratives for the museums.
How object is exposed in time, is not done
-> absence of context around the work & absence of general context

Seda: Museum is part of nation building project, it is about creating whiteness
How much is it about the narrative? Start somewhere else? 
Marginalised community vs national context
Zeljko: Coming from recent Vouging trend Ultra Red Group investigated  "Paris is Burning" narrative and Madonna dancers. This person organized exhibitions around movements 
Peter: exhibition rereading Peruvian art history - reference???
Zeljko: queering comes from subjectivities, shouldn't be done retrospectively
Geraldine: Question the very concept of "access". (acess is nothing without context for instance) . The question of clerical work.. does all work related with information needs to be clerical (documents, writing, or the are possibilities for other approaches than can infuse more energy to traditional archivism, and archivalist impulses and fevers?