Difference between revisions of "To have the name of the object: conversations with Saskia Willaert"

From DiVersions
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div data-lang="en" lang="to-have-the-name-of-the-object-en">
+
<div data-lang="en" lang="en" id="to-have-the-name-of-the-object-en">
 
== To have the name of the object ==
 
== To have the name of the object ==
==== Conversations with Saskia Willaert ====
+
<div class="author"> Conversations with Saskia Willaert </div>
  
''Saskia Willaert is in charge of the collection of African instruments at the Musical Instruments Museum in Brussels. She is also responsible for the inventory of these instruments and the digital documentation of them. In 2016, we had two conversations with her about the details of that work.''
+
<p class="intro-pieces">''Saskia Willaert is in charge of the collection of African instruments at the Musical Instruments Museum in Brussels. She is also responsible for the inventory of these instruments and their digital documentation. In 2016, we had two conversations with her about the details of that work.''</p>
  
 
<div class="acknowledgment onlyprint">
 
<div class="acknowledgment onlyprint">
Line 9: Line 9:
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
 +
<div class="big-image onlyscreen">
 
[[file:hand.JPG|frame|[The digital system] had a big impact. (...) Now we can prove we are the owners of all these objects because we have pictures and because we have systematic links between the inventory number and the physical place where the object is.]]
 
[[file:hand.JPG|frame|[The digital system] had a big impact. (...) Now we can prove we are the owners of all these objects because we have pictures and because we have systematic links between the inventory number and the physical place where the object is.]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div class="big-image break">
+
<div class="big-image onlyprint">
 +
[[file:hand bw-2000px.JPG|frame|[The digital system] had a big impact. (...) Now we can prove we are the owners of all these objects because we have pictures and because we have systematic links between the inventory number and the physical place where the object is.]]
 +
</div>
  
<div class="big-image">
+
<div class="big-image onlyscreen">
 
[[file:cluster.JPG|frame|For instance there is an article (...) about the history of the growth of the African instruments collection at the end of the 19th century. By having systematized information the way we did, I could easily find back that each time that Henry Morton Stanley moved further along the Congo river, more instruments from the inner Congo came into the museum.]]
 
[[file:cluster.JPG|frame|For instance there is an article (...) about the history of the growth of the African instruments collection at the end of the 19th century. By having systematized information the way we did, I could easily find back that each time that Henry Morton Stanley moved further along the Congo river, more instruments from the inner Congo came into the museum.]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div class="big-image">
+
<div class="big-image onlyprint">
 +
[[file:cluster bw-2000px.JPG|frame|For instance there is an article (...) about the history of the growth of the African instruments collection at the end of the 19th century. By having systematized information the way we did, I could easily find back that each time that Henry Morton Stanley moved further along the Congo river, more instruments from the inner Congo came into the museum.]]
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="big-image onlyscreen">
 
[[file:several names.JPG|frame|The big importance of [digitizing] the African collections is that the agents of museums [in Africa] provide local names and sometimes the name of the local builders. This is never the case in western collections because we have no clue, and we have long been taught that it's not interesting at all to have them.]]
 
[[file:several names.JPG|frame|The big importance of [digitizing] the African collections is that the agents of museums [in Africa] provide local names and sometimes the name of the local builders. This is never the case in western collections because we have no clue, and we have long been taught that it's not interesting at all to have them.]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
<div class="big-image">
+
<div class="big-image onlyprint">
 +
[[file:several names bw-2000px.JPG|frame|The big importance of [digitizing] the African collections is that the agents of museums [in Africa] provide local names and sometimes the name of the local builders. This is never the case in western collections because we have no clue, and we have long been taught that it's not interesting at all to have them.]]
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div class="big-image break onlyscreen">
 
[[file:Instruments.JPG|frame|It's a political thing in a way of course. It has been during centuries [that] cultural objects have been taken away from Congo and Africa and have been put into western collections. To have the name of the object was not important because it was unpronounceable, and the man who made it was even less important. It was just a decorative, beautiful, aesthetic thing in the best case. But in most cases, it was just an exotic thing.]]  
 
[[file:Instruments.JPG|frame|It's a political thing in a way of course. It has been during centuries [that] cultural objects have been taken away from Congo and Africa and have been put into western collections. To have the name of the object was not important because it was unpronounceable, and the man who made it was even less important. It was just a decorative, beautiful, aesthetic thing in the best case. But in most cases, it was just an exotic thing.]]  
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="big-image onlyprint">
 +
[[file:Instruments bw-2000px.JPG|frame|It's a political thing in a way of course. It has been during centuries [that] cultural objects have been taken away from Congo and Africa and have been put into western collections. To have the name of the object was not important because it was unpronounceable, and the man who made it was even less important. It was just a decorative, beautiful, aesthetic thing in the best case. But in most cases, it was just an exotic thing.]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Latest revision as of 15:42, 3 December 2020

To have the name of the object

Conversations with Saskia Willaert

Saskia Willaert is in charge of the collection of African instruments at the Musical Instruments Museum in Brussels. She is also responsible for the inventory of these instruments and their digital documentation. In 2016, we had two conversations with her about the details of that work.

October and December 2016, Saskia Willaert in conversation with Michael Murtaugh, Femke Snelting, Martino Morandi and Sam Muirhead. Photographs: Michael Murtaugh

[The digital system] had a big impact. (...) Now we can prove we are the owners of all these objects because we have pictures and because we have systematic links between the inventory number and the physical place where the object is.
[The digital system] had a big impact. (...) Now we can prove we are the owners of all these objects because we have pictures and because we have systematic links between the inventory number and the physical place where the object is.
For instance there is an article (...) about the history of the growth of the African instruments collection at the end of the 19th century. By having systematized information the way we did, I could easily find back that each time that Henry Morton Stanley moved further along the Congo river, more instruments from the inner Congo came into the museum.
For instance there is an article (...) about the history of the growth of the African instruments collection at the end of the 19th century. By having systematized information the way we did, I could easily find back that each time that Henry Morton Stanley moved further along the Congo river, more instruments from the inner Congo came into the museum.
The big importance of [digitizing] the African collections is that the agents of museums [in Africa] provide local names and sometimes the name of the local builders. This is never the case in western collections because we have no clue, and we have long been taught that it's not interesting at all to have them.
The big importance of [digitizing] the African collections is that the agents of museums [in Africa] provide local names and sometimes the name of the local builders. This is never the case in western collections because we have no clue, and we have long been taught that it's not interesting at all to have them.
It's a political thing in a way of course. It has been during centuries [that] cultural objects have been taken away from Congo and Africa and have been put into western collections. To have the name of the object was not important because it was unpronounceable, and the man who made it was even less important. It was just a decorative, beautiful, aesthetic thing in the best case. But in most cases, it was just an exotic thing.
It's a political thing in a way of course. It has been during centuries [that] cultural objects have been taken away from Congo and Africa and have been put into western collections. To have the name of the object was not important because it was unpronounceable, and the man who made it was even less important. It was just a decorative, beautiful, aesthetic thing in the best case. But in most cases, it was just an exotic thing.

October and December 2016, Saskia Willaert in conversation with Michael Murtaugh, Femke Snelting, Martino Morandi and Sam Muirhead. Photographs: Michael Murtaugh